A comparative study based on five industrial heritage renovation cases
With 2,000+ industrial heritage sites nationwide facing homogenization, this study proposes a "cultural resilience" framework based on five case studies.
From 2018-2023, industrial heritage projects grew 35% annually, yet cultural homogenization intensified. Root cause: over-reliance on "spatial reproduction" logic.
Four dimensions: cultural memory layering (preserving historical info), spatial narrative weaving (old-new dialogue), functional regeneration (contemporary needs), community identity (place attachment).
Systematic comparison across five industrial types: steel (Xi'an 1896), textile (Shanghai M50), power (Shenzhen OCT), shipbuilding (Guangzhou Redtory), warehousing (Beijing 798).
Five principles: retain 30%+ original structural visibility; 1:3 to 1:1 old-to-new material ratio; 20% flexible space; 15% structural margin; 10%+ community participatory space.
Anchored in individual roles, exploring new symbiotic relationships between humans, space, and technology in future society.
Focusing on vertical community practices in East Asian high-density urban contexts, evaluating spatial quality, social interaction, and community identity.
Comparing waterfront regeneration practices in Guangzhou, Shenzhen, and Zhuhai to extract replicable paradigms.
Exploring parametric workflows based on Rhino+Grasshopper for multi-objective optimization of building form, daylight, and energy.